They are seeking an eight-year sentence for Joao Maleck

The lawyers of the criminal investigation party managed to reanalyze the case of Joao Maleck

Joao Maleck’s case has been reopened In the 10th Jalisco Comprehensive Juvenile Justice and Criminal Matters Chamber, to challenge damages, in the case of the unlawful deaths of María Fernanda Peña and Alejandro Castro in 2019, the protection of victims requires the established punishment is also analyzed and increased to eight years, informed the prosecutor’s lawyer, at ESPN Digital.

“An appeal was lodged against the sentence, in which Joao He was allowed access to benefits, paying damages and a fine, he could go home, get out of prison. The appeal was filed against it and the resolution is for it to be reopened, to examine whether or not the rights of indirect victims, minors and Maria Fernanda’s mother have been violated, given that the woman is over 60 and the minors’ guarantees have been violated, “said lawyer Anuar García Gutiérez, who is defending the prosecution, in an interview with ESPN Digital.

The lawyer stated that, if the established sanction can be challenged, will seek to increase the sentence to more than four years, seeking “Joao Maleck to pay with a fair sentence”.

“A sentence in which he has no benefits, I can’t talk about the maximum punishment, because he is a delinquent cousin and how old he is, but if he asked me, we would not expect a sentence of less than eight years in prison, he admitted.

In the next few hours it will be decided whether the sanction applied to Joao Maleck can be overturned or only the compensation he has to pay can be analyzed., after in December 2020 he was sentenced to three years, eight months and 15 days, in addition to the payment for damages of 422 thousand 450 pesos.

“If they tell us that it is only to repair the damage, for the procedural reasons we have seen, we are going to file a judgment, because what interests them is that the sentence against Joao is aggravated, they are not interested. of the economic problem and would have the right to go to a federal court so that it can decide on the violations we find ”.

.Source