Nearly a month after enjoying bail, Joao Maleck was reported to have had an irregular departure because he did so without his knowledge Precautions, as provided José de Jesús López Lucano, lawyer for one of the casualty clues about the accident in which they died Maria Fernanda Peña and Alejandro Castro on June 23, 2019.
Lopez Lucano, who represents Martha Alvarez, Maria Fernanda’s mother, said that, in addition to the lack of measures, the departure was very fast, because in less than 3 hours she was authorized.
“We will remember that on December 15, in a series of irregularities, Mr. Junior Joao Maleck was fired. What do I mean by these irregularities? Recall that the request for defense was at 9:06 a.m., an agreement is immediately made to release him and at 12:15 the office for freedom is received “, López Lucano explained to him Mediotiempo.
“This agreement, at the time it was concluded by the judge or her staff, left or failed to impose the precautionary measures on which Junior Joao Maleck was to be released “.
For him lawyer, this process normally takes 3 to 5 days and with Malecki it was 3 hours. It was on December 15 when the football player left prison Puente Grande, Jalisco.
“I had to trust him the condition of appearing to sign periodically, the condition of not leaving the country or even not leaving the state, which did not happen and is what concerns us today, because there is practically no a restriction of freedom to the Lord. ; ie it has a number of conditions which are bound by an agreement and which it must comply with“And since this does not exist, he can go freely either here or anywhere in the world,” he added.
Lopez Lucano took the opportunity to ask Judicial Council research for Judge María Eréndira Mercado, who was the one who authorized Joao’s departure without restrictions.
“Today it has its consequences and we ask the Judicial or Judicial Council to initiate an investigation into the judge who issued this agreement through the Visitation area, given this irresponsibility with which it was issued and with which Mr. Junior could have celebrated the New Year in Las Vegas , if so, given that he has no restrictions on departure or mobility, “he said.
THEY DID NOT RECEIVE THE PAYMENT OF THE DEPOSIT
The lawyer also assured that they did not receive the payment bail who submitted Zurich insurance For what Malecki I had freedomThis is because I am on holiday in court.
“I knew they were filed, we have a copy of the document, but I’m in court,” he said.
Nor was there any intention to meet with families affected and appeal introduced by accused.
“We are the same, unfortunately, they are on holiday in the judiciary, we have to wait because, unlike what happens with freedom, the appeal was not even sent to the Supreme Court“He added.
(…)
(…)