
Raphael Warnock, center and Jon Ossoff, attend a rally in Garden City, Georgia, on December 19th.
Photographer: Colin Douglas Gray / Bloomberg
Photographer: Colin Douglas Gray / Bloomberg
Investors are not yet ready to leave behind this chaotic year. There is another persistent risk event: the last races of the 2020 elections that spilled over into next year.
Although not as pronounced as last month’s election coverage, futures options and volatility signal increased concern about the potential market turmoil resulting from the January 5 Georgia race results that will determine whether Republicans will hold Senate control.
Prior to the November vote, many considered the democratic approach to the election to be one of the most optimistic results possible for US action. Since then, however, the market has shown that it is comfortable with a potentially divided continuous control of the government – a background that has historically produced strong profits.
“There’s no doubt, if you go from red to blue, you have to price for something that seems less favorable because of markets that like blockages, markets that like the status quo,” said Phil Camporeale, CEO of many-asset solutions for JPMorgan Asset Management.
The focus on the leak – and the demand for turbulence protection coverage – is focused on uncertainty about exactly how investors should position themselves in front of a Joe Biden presidency. He needs the Senate’s democratic scrutiny to execute on an agenda that would boost green energy companies to the detriment of fossil fuel producers, while leading to more economic aid packages and infrastructure spending. However, it could also help increase the corporate tax rate and intensify regulatory control.
“It is impossible to overstate how important these choices are for the size, scale and speed of fiscal, fiscal and regulatory policy in 2021,” Cowen analyst Chris Krueger wrote in a December 21 note.
Fences in place
There are potential winners and losers in both scenarios and it is debatable, which would be a better scenario for the overall long-term stock market. But traders seem to be guarding against the volatility that could erupt in the short term if Georgia’s results cause investors to cram into the perceived beneficiaries of the result and give up perceived losses.
Hedging probably also reflects the concern that even small surprises could create turmoil in a stock market that needs the general public to continue investing after a spectacular run. The S&P 500 rose 65% from its lowest level in March, with an assortment of valuation values at its highest in the last decade or so.
“The idea that fiscal policy and public procurement could matter more than earnings and revenues – it’s a lot like 2020, isn’t it? – it is instinctively uncomfortable and supports volatility above normal, persisting “, wrote Julian Emanual, stock strategist at BTIG brokerage, in a recent note.
Biden shares will have history and will feed, not much
Eliminations in Georgia were triggered after no candidate for the two seats in the Senate won a majority of votes. Republican David Perdue is running for re-election against Jon Ossoff, while Senator Kelly Loeffler faces Democrat Raphael Warnock. Polls show a close battle between Republican and Democrat competitors, while the PredictIt betting market has a small advantage for Republicans. President Donald Trump’s last-minute request for higher payments to Americans as part of a Covid-19 aid package is also a convenience that could affect voting.
The proximity of the races has prevented investors from becoming too confident about what to expect in the first part of the Biden administration. If Democrats win both races, it gives them control of the Senate with the help of equality votes from elected Vice President Kamala Harris. (Two independent senators meet with Democrats.)
“We believe both elections are too close to convening,” said Tom Hainlin, a strategist at Ascent Private Wealth Group at US Bank Wealth Management, adding that “some short-term market volatility is possible” after the vote, if Democrats occupy both. places.
Evercore ISI strategists say the Cboe Volatility Index futures curve remains “extremely steep” due to events in Georgia, similar to the situation in the November races.

VIX futures curve starting December 23rd
Meanwhile, the one-month decline in the S&P 500, or a measure of the cost in the options down, stood at the 92nd percentile of a historical range, according to data compiled by Nomura Securities. “The focus is on protection after a drastic flight and the risk of a change in the macroeconomic regime near the Georgia Senate leak,” Charlie McElligott, a multi-asset strategist at Nomura, wrote in a recent note to clients.
Many in the market assume that Republican candidates will keep both seats, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist for LPL Financial, so that any surprise “could upset the apple cart.”
Upset things
LPL research has shown that a divided Congress has historically been good for the stock market – in the last seven decades, the S&P 500 it returned on average by 17.2% annually when power was divided between the two parties. This compares with a 10.7% lead when Democrats were in the lead and 13.4% with Republicans in both houses.

The activity is also the warming on the Treasury options market, highlighted by a contrary bet that appeared late Monday. The bet was against the potential for aggressive fiscal stimulus that would stimulate a long-term end to the bond market and will be paid if any increase in yields is capped at around 10 basis points from current levels for about the next month. the bet is based on a theme that has soared in treasury options – that selling in Georgia could trigger a strong sell-off in treasury.
The Treasury Options Market returns as Georgia leaks approach
Certainly, many on Wall Street do not anticipate Georgia racing as too big a game changer. A weak Senate majority for Democrats may not necessarily mean the immediate introduction of new policies, including a revision of tax rates, according to Art Hogan, chief market strategist at National Securities Corp.
“I just don’t think they’re playing into this idea: ‘God, immediately higher corporate taxes and grand changes.’ I think it’s much more of a centrist mentality that we could have some gradual changes, “Hogan said by telephone. “The market narrative changed pretty quickly, too, after the election, saying, ‘Hey, wait a minute, I didn’t get blue wave, but we have a new president and with that comes probably a quieter presence around international relations, tariffs and trade and more normalization. I think the market has settled into this concept. “
– With the assistance of Lu Wang and Sarah Ponczek