“Have you heard of a peer-reviewed study by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that these masks have an absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19?” Not? It was posted on the government website of the National Center for Biotechnological Information, ”NOQReport.com reported. “NCBI is a branch of the National Institutes of Health, so it would be thought that such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the ‘science-loving’ people of Big Tech.”
The study found: “The data suggest that both medical and non-medical masks are ineffective for viral and infectious diseases, such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.”
Instead, it was revealed that no related media reported this. For some strange reason, the inherited media seem to want to perpetuate the myth of the mask … as if they would like to wear a cloth mask.
In July 2020, Globe bought a cloth mask from a pharmacy in preparation for a plane ride. This is the warning on the box: “The antimicrobial face mask does not protect users from bacteria, viruses, germs or other disease organisms.” (see photo above)
Just proving it was a masked narrative, Twitter suspended former Trump adviser Steve Cortez when he Posted remove the study with its comments:
Twitter has been suspended @CortesSteve for citing a Stanford NIH mask study. pic.twitter.com/2y460zkN0Z
– Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) April 17, 2021
Globe has questioned and reported on the lack of mask science since the spring of 2020 – more than a year ago. I spoke with almost 20 epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists, various doctors, public health doctors and medical experts.
Here is an article:
“According to immunologists and epidemiologists, the California Globe interviewed, ordering people inside, closing schools, wearing masks and social distancing is the opposite of what should be done for the health and well-being of society. The herd’s immunity should be the real goal of health, while protecting the most vulnerable – in the case of coronavirus, the elderly and infirm are limited to nursing homes. ”
The governor issued an executive order and asked his Department of Public Health to issue a new directive on Thursday that said:
“In the last four months, I have learned a lot about the COVID-19 transmission, especially this one infected people, but who are asymptomatic or presymptomatic plays an important role in spreading the community. The use of face coverings by everyone can limit the release of infected drops when talking, coughing and / or sneezing, as well as strengthen physical distance. ”
What was once a curve flattening directive has become “infected but asymptomatic or presymptomatic people play an important role in the spread of the community. ”
And in another article:
The California Globe reported that Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, a professor of medicine and public health at the University of California, Los Angeles, said:
“I don’t think there’s any evidence that wearing a surgical mask has any benefit in protecting someone in general from exposure or being infected. We usually recommend that sick people wear surgical masks to prevent transmission [to others]”It can be a kind of awareness tool, but in terms of its direct benefits, there is no data,” added Dr. Klausner.
Dr. Brosseau and Dr. Sietsema, both national experts in respiratory protection and infectious diseases at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said: “We do not recommend that the general public not showing symptoms of COVID-19-like disease be Routinely wear surgical cloths or masks because there is no scientific evidence that they are effective in reducing the risk of transmitting SARS-CoV-2. ”
Another Globe article found:
“The Centers for Disease Control conducted an analysis of 10 RCTs that examined the impact of face masks on reducing influenza infections in a community,” the California Globe reported in “Why I Don’t Wear a Mask.” “They concluded that these studies” did not find a significant reduction in the transmission of influenza with the use of face masks. ” These studies covered a wide range of environmental conditions, from university dormitories to households, but the results were the same for all. ”
“There is limited evidence for this [masks] “They apply to masks” worn by the infected person for source control OR when worn by uninfected people. “They unambiguously concluded that there was” no significant effect of facial masks. ” on the transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza ”.
An April 2020 article reported:
COVID-19 virus is mainly transmitted between humans through respiratory drops – sneezing and coughing.
The transmission of drops occurs when a person is in close contact with someone who has respiratory symptoms and coughs or sneezes. Respiratory drops can then be transmitted through the mouth and nose, or eyes, if exposed to potentially infectious respiratory drops.
This is why many medical experts say that masks will not prevent exposure to COVID-19 because in order to actually wear enough equipment to prevent exposure, you should wear goggles as well as a mask that covers your nose and the mouth. And it’s still a big maybe.
As a semi-joking doctor put it, “if the underwear can’t prevent a fart from escaping, how can a cloth mask protect against a contagious virus?” While it was funny, his idea was that cloth masks are not effective and are not used in hospitals.
The Stanford study said: “Wearing a face mask mechanically restricts breathing by increasing resistance to air movement during both inhalation and exhalationends[12,13]. Prolonging the continuous effect of wearing a face mask can be harmful to health. ”
And the Stanford study found that the psychological effects of wearing a face mask are quite negative, as shown in the graph in Table 1.
“Science follows” has a new meaning.
Be sure to reread “The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Facial Masks, Social Distancing, and Tracking Contacts,” a June 2020 Globe article.
