The fast-food restaurant chain Subway will have to explain to a California court the composition of one of its famous sandwiches after two residents reported that tone which they actually use as an ingredient it’s not fish, according to EFE.
In their complaint, they claim that what Subway advertises as a “tone” is in fact “a mixture of various mixtures which do not constitute tone and which have been mixed to mimic their appearance. “
Such a statement, which the company categorically denied, was made after performing “laboratory tests in which no traces of tuna were found in the samples” and which tries to determine what the substance is made of, the prosecutor said. the prosecutor’s office.
The lawsuit was filed last week in a California court, but came to light after the Washington Post reported it.
After the news outcry, since Subway is a very popular chain in the United States with a presence in other countries, a company spokesman described the allegations as “unfounded.”
“Simply there is no truth in the allegations of the complaint that was filed in California. Subway delivers 100% cooked tuna to its restaurants, which is blended with mayonnaise and used in fresh sandwiches, wraps and salads enjoyed by our customers, ”the company said in a statement.
In addition, the company considered that the complaint would adversely affect the franchised sandwich chain stores and the small owners of each business.
You might be interested
However, the lawyer who filed the lawsuit, Alex Brown, insists that no person in charge of Subway specified the composition of the ingredient when they were contacted to ask “what they sell.” no traces of “tone or fish protein. “
This is not the first time a Subway ingredient has been called into question, as in October the Irish Supreme Court ruled that bread on its menus could not be considered “technically bread” due to its high sugar content.