SPAC Boom faces a new SEC threat with reduced accounting

Ripple says it is facing an SEC lawsuit as Cryptocurrency XRP drops

Photographer: Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg

U.S. regulators are throwing another key into the Wall Street SPAC car, preventing the way accounting rules apply to a key element of companies with incomplete verification.

The Securities and Exchange Commission presents new guidance that guarantees, which are issued to early investors in transactions, may not be considered equity instruments and may instead be liabilities for accounting purposes. The move, reported earlier by Bloomberg News, threatens to discontinue deposits for new special-purpose procurement companies until the issue is resolved.

Accounting considerations mark the SEC’s most recent effort to counter the white SPAC market. For months, the regulator has raised red flags that investors are not fully aware of the potential risks associated with blank check companies, which are listed on public stock exchanges to raise money to buy other entities.

See also: SEC Warns SPACs There is no way around the Securities Law

The SEC began addressing accountants last week with guidance on mandates, according to people familiar with the matter. A number of hundreds of deposits for new SPACs could be affected, said people, who asked not to be named because the conversations were private.

“The SEC has indicated that it will not declare any effective registration statement unless the mandate issue is resolved,” according to a client note sent by accounting firm Marcum, which was reviewed by Bloomberg.

In a SPAC, early investors buy units, which usually include a common share and a term fraction to buy more shares at a later date. They are considered sweeteners for supporters and have so far been considered equity instruments for accounting purposes. Sponsorship teams – managing a SPAC – usually receive mandates to find a business, in addition to the founder’s actions.

In a statement late Monday, SEC officials urged those involved in the SPAC to pay attention to the accounting implications of their transactions. They said a recent market analysis showed a de facto pattern in transactions in which “guarantees should be classified as a measured fair value liability, with changes in fair value in each period reported in earnings”.

.Source