Prince Harry’s “dirty” bare feet sparkle for the king to “buy some shoes and put them aside”

Prince Harry’s “dirty” bare feet sparked calls for the king to “buy some shoes and put them aside” after announcing baby number two with his wife Meghan Sunday.

A spokesman for the couple said in a statement: “We can confirm that Archie will be an older brother. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are happy to have their second child.

Harry, 36, and Meghan, 39, confirmed the happy news with a black-and-white photo of them. The couple is sitting next to a tree with Harry’s hand placed under Meghan’s head, while she lies on his lap, her hand resting on the swelling.

But for many fans, the sight of the prince’s bare feet proved too great.

Twitter user @KellyannBabes wrote: “Congratulations Harry and Meghan … but there is a serious need for Harry’s bare feet.”

@ Matriarch4 added: “Someone has to buy Harry shoes. Well, feet.

@Mama_Cougar said: ‘OK OK I’ll be the one to say it. If I ever see Prince Harry’s bare feet again, it will be too soon.

Harry, 36, and Meghan, 39, confirmed the news with a black-and-white photo.  But for many fans, the sight of the prince's bare feet proved too great

Harry, 36, and Meghan, 39, confirmed the news with a black-and-white photo. But for many fans, the sight of the prince’s bare feet proved too great

The child will be the eighth in line to the British throne.

A spokesman for Buckingham Palace said: “His Majesty, the Duke of Edinburgh, the Prince of Wales and the whole family are delighted and wish them well.”

The couple, who currently live in California, announced the news on the 37th birthday of Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, who announced that she was pregnant with him on Valentine’s Day in 1984.

But for some, the photo shared to celebrate their pregnancy – taken by the couple’s longtime friend Misan Harriman – was also a sign of disrespect.

Twitter user @MirandaUganda said: “In many countries it is very offensive to show the soles of your feet.”

@ZoeThinks said, “I wonder why we have to look at her dirty feet?”

She added: “In many Arab, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist countries, showing the soles of the feet is a sign of disrespect.”

Others said that “everything else is perfect” – Harry’s barefoot bar.

@thedyingswann said: “My only complaint about that image is that Harry is barefoot – I hate to see his feet with passionate passion. Everything else is perfect! ‘

“I’m glad for them, but please, Harry puts his feet up,” added user @ g0ldxnharry.

Prince Harry's

Prince Harry’s “dirty” bare feet sparked calls for the royal to “buy some shoes and put them aside” after announcing the second baby with his wife Meghan in a Valentine’s Day photo

Harry and Meghan shocked the world last year when they resigned as senior kings and announced that they would move to North America with baby Archie, who will turn two in May.

The couple boasted of a spacious nine-bedroom mansion in Montecito that they bought for $ 14.65 million in June last year.

Their baby announcement came just days after Cousin Harry, Princess Eugenie, received a baby boy on February 9th.

The sex of the couple’s second child, as well as the due date, remain unclear.

Baby Sussex will be the queen and duke of Edinburgh the 10th or 11th great-grandson, depending on whether he or she arrives before or after Zara Tindall’s baby, who is due to appear in 2021.

Meghan recycled a Carolina Herrera dress made during her first pregnancy for the birth announcement photo.

Harriman, the Nigerian-born British photographer who took the picture, wrote on Twitter: “Meg, I was there at your wedding to watch this love story and my friend, I am honored to catch her growing up.

“Congratulations to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on this good news!”

It is not clear where the photo was taken, but Harriman indicated that he did it remotely via an iPad.

Speaking to British Vogue following the announcement of the baby, Harriman said: “Being asked to help share this absolute joy after such an unimaginable loss and heartache is a sign of true friendship.

“Meg reminded me that if I hadn’t introduced her to a mutual friend, then she wouldn’t have met Harry.

“I’m grateful for any small role I’ve played.”

About how he captured the image, he said: “With the tree of life behind them and the garden representing fertility, life and moving forward, they needed no direction, because they are, and have always been, waltzing through life together. as absolute pair souls. ‘

Reacting to the image of Twitter user @KayakSeaFishing, he said: “Harry has very ugly legs. It’s like a hobbit!

@delabole added: “You never mind the baby’s baby … I just don’t want to see Harry’s bare feet.”

And while Twitter user @ Positivelady92 called it “a great photo,” they added, “I think Harry needs to wash his feet.”

@ Debied123 agreed, adding: “Who else has increased the condition of Harry’s legs?”

@TaliaBM simply said, “Put Prince Harry’s feet” under things I never wanted to see. ”

The Duke said in 2019 that he will have two children just for the sake of the planet a year after he married Markle married at Windsor Castle in May 2018.

Meghan and Harry welcomed their first child Archie (pictured) in May 2019

Meghan and Harry welcomed their first child Archie (pictured) in May 2019

In early 2020, Meghan and Harry announced that they were giving up their royal duties and moving to North America. They recently bought a house in Santa Barbara, California.

Sixth, Harry and former actress Meghan took care of securing funding for their new lives, signing a lucrative deal with streaming giant Netflix, which is rumored to be worth more than £ 150 million. and another multi-million pound podcast deal with Spotify.

Meghan also invested in a vegan coffee brand late last year – her first investment since coming to the US – which Oprah Winfrey promoted to 19.2 million Instagram followers in December.

They also worked at the Archewell Charitable Foundation, but sparked controversy when Harry was accused of political interference after asking people in the United States to “reject hate speech” and vote in the presidential election.

The happy news comes on the 37th anniversary of Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, announcing that she was pregnant with him on Valentine’s Day in 1984.

In November, Meghan revealed that she had a miscarriage in July 2020, giving a personal account of the traumatic experience in hopes of helping others.

Earlier this month, the author of Meghan’s autobiography, Omid Scobie, claimed that the duchess did not intend to join Harry on his first trip back to Britain this summer because he did not want to be away from Archie.

Scobie added that Meghan will probably catch up with the family practically, explaining: “Archie loves to be on Zoom calls with the family and Regina enjoys them throughout the closing”.

Photographer Harriman, 55, is known for his photos of celebrities and activists. His work documenting the Black Lives Matter protests this summer caught the attention of Edward Enniful, the publisher of British Vogue, who commissioned him to become the first black man to film a Vogue cover in its 104-year history.

His images were presented on the cover of the prestigious September issue.

It is also unclear how Harriman was introduced to the Duke and Duchess, but his legend has shown that he has known them for a long time.

The new baby of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be the eighth in line to the throne

The first seven seats will remain unchanged – the Prince of Wales, the Duke of Cambridge, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis, Harry and Archie Mountbatten-Windsor.

Harry retained his place in the line of succession, despite giving up the royal life and giving up his HRH style.

When the new addition of Harry and Meghan arrives, the Duke of York, who was born second in 1960, will move to ninth.

Andrew stopped performing royal duties in 2019, following his controversial Newsnight interview, about his friendship with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The boy or girl will enter the line of succession behind his older brother Archie.

Andrew’s eldest daughter, Princess Beatrice, will finish 10th in a row.

Her youngest, Princess Eugenie, will fall from the top 10 to become 11th in line, and her newborn son will move to 12th.

Baby Sussex will be both the queen and the 11th great-grandson of the Duke of Edinburgh, depending on whether he or she is born before or after the baby Zara Tindall.

The monarch and Philip’s great-grandchildren so far are: Savannah and Isla Phillips; George, Charlotte and Louis; Mia and Lena Tindall; Archie and Princess Eugenie’s little boy.

The new baby will not have the right to be HRH or to be a prince or princess, due to the rules established more than 100 years ago by George V.

He or she is allowed to be a Lord or a Lady, but according to Harry and Meghan’s wishes, he will be a simple Master, such as Archie or Miss (first name) Mountbatten-Windsor.

Being the first son of a duke, Archie could have become Earl of Dumbarton – one of Harry’s subsidiary titles – or he could have been Lord Archie Mountbatten-Windsor.

But the duke broke the royal convention by making a personal decision not to use a title, considered to be inspired by Harry’s desire to have been a normal child, rather than a prince, as he grew up.

However, the baby, like Archie, will have the right to be HRH and prince or princess when the Prince of Wales ascends the throne – although it is believed that Harry and Meghan are unlikely to opt for such a change.

The new child will not need the monarch’s permission to marry.

For hundreds of years, the Royal Law of Marriages of 1772 meant that the descendants of George II had to seek the consent of the sovereign before marriage, otherwise their marriages were considered invalid.

But this law was repealed by the Crown Succession Act.

He restricted consent to only the first six people in the line of succession, so since the new baby is in the eighth line, they will no longer have to apply for a monarch’s approval to get married.

Perhaps they will have to do so in the future, when the Duke of Cambridge will finally become king and if there have been no other additions before them in the line of succession.

King George III, nephew of George II, had ordered the act of 1772, now repealed, after his younger brother, the Duke of Cumberland, secretly married Lady Anne Horton, considered an extremely destitute widow. reputation of an ordinary man.

.Source