Miguel Herrera claims to be the most successful coach in history America, when the reality is far from that, in fact, his percentage of efficiency in front of the Eagles calls into question his words.
Herrera has won four titles with America, two in the league, a Cup tournament and a Champions League and tied for first place Raúl Cárdenas and Jorge Vieira who also won four championships, but with huge differences.
“Piojo” needed 23 tournaments to reach the four championships, which gives it an efficiency rate of only 17 percent.
Raúl Cárdenas, with four credits, the 1975-76 League, the 1975-76 Champions, the 1977 CONCACAF and the 1978 Inter-American, did so in just seven tournaments.
READ MORE; Armando Romero, former football player and captain of Cruz Azul, dies
Jorge Vieira, also with four championships that were two in the league and a pair of champions, did so in eight tournaments.
Miguel Herrera completed 23 tournaments, 11 in the league and won two titles, five in the cup and won a championship, remained empty after playing three Concachampions, got the only Champion of Champions who played and could not win League Cup, Campeones Cup or MX Super Cup.
While it is true that he is the coach with the most victories in American history, reaching 138 and leaving José Antonio Roca in second place with 133, he is also one of the technicians with the most losses at the club.
Herrera suffered 63 setbacks and was one of José Antonio Roca who suffered 64, in addition to never winning an international tournament and is also the second coach with the most losses in the classics against Chivas with 5 countermeasures.
Miguel Herrera’s words, which insist that he is the biggest winner in the club’s history, contrast with the cold numbers that do not agree with him.
Of the 21 tournaments played with Águilas del América in two different stages, he won only four championships and in 17 he was left empty.
He played three concachampions and his maximum goal was to reach the semifinals.
Not to mention the indiscipline he committed off the field that influenced his departure from the team.