In January 2020, a laboratory on the second floor of Northwestern University was filled with the gentle rocking of three robots pushing each other around. The trio was in a small ring, hitting each other, although the little robots were not the rock-em, sock-em variety. These were smart, active particles – “smarticles” – equipped with two flaps like arm blades, which extend less than 6 inches from one end to the other and covered with labels to track their position and orientation. The little bullies went through the unpredictable and unpleasant movements of the disorder until, from time to time, they passed gracefully in recognized coordinating movements: a dance.
The articles were not programmed with particular instructions, nor were they told to make each other beautiful. Robots were prescribed units or movement patterns for their keys, which surprisingly captured dance-like sequences. The underlying models and physics are described in a paper published today in the journal Science. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation, the James S. McDonnell Foundation and the Army Research Office.
When the smartphones were out of sync, there was a “chaos of dampers and collisions around the ring, which were fascinating to watch, but certainly not ordered,” said Thomas Ber.the streetyou, a robotist at Northwestern University and co-author of the paper, in a video call. But teaming up with Pavel Chvykov, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Jeremy England, a former physicist at MIT and now at Georgia Tech, the research team programmed the smartphones to perform the driving model at the same time.
“Suddenly, they were doing this beautiful rotating procession,” Berr saidIsaid yours. “Because someone who had smarticles and didn’t make them, did that before, it felt like [Chvykov] I came and did a magic trick with my own instruments. “
The order is in many places in the natural world – birds that gather, for example, or water that crystallizes in ice – but its prediction is a beast in unbalanced conditions, where there are external forces at play. (And, to be clear, the world of non-equilibrium is the big, wide one outside your window – a vast realm compared to the facts achievable in a predictable laboratory setting). In the 1870s, a Swiss physicist named Charles Soret performed experiments that showed how a solution of salt from a tube exposed to heat on one side would cause a higher order of particles on the colder side. As the molecules move more violently on the hot side of the tube, more of them end up traveling on the colder side; the colder molecules, with their delicate movements, do not get to travel so fast. What this means is that particles end up accumulating on the cold side of the tube. The principle, called thermophoresis, was a model for England and Chvykov to see the promise of objects in so-called low-noise states.
G / O Media may receive a commission
Rattling is when matter uses the energy flowing in it to move. According to England, the louder the noise, the more random or spastic the movement and the lower the noise, the more intentional or incremental the movement. Both could also be true.
“The point is, if your matter and energy source allow for a low-noise state, the system will randomly rearrange itself until it finds that state and then get stuck there,” England said in a statement from Georgia Tech. . “If you provide energy by force with a certain pattern, it means that the selected state will discover a way to move matter that fits that pattern fine.”
In this case, the model was the prescribed flap movement, and the matter moving to fit that model were robots slapping each other in rotations and translations about the ring that closed them. These little flappers were a great testing ground for the idea that low-noise states would give rise to stable, self-organized dances. Unlike other muses, smarts did not have a molecular source of self-ordering behavior (such as how water turns to ice at a certain temperature). The other variables in play in crystals give rise to alternative explanations for command, clouding the low-noise idea that the research team wanted to test.
Because smart phones only move through contact with each other (they can’t walk or rotate), there are also fewer unknowns about the origin of object mobility, England said, a problem you would have if you all smarts would have small engines propelling them into their dance. When robots can only move by pushing each other, you know that the movement you see is the result of collective behavior.
“This paper suggests a general principle that complex systems naturally gravitate toward” noise-minimizing “behavior,” said Arvind Murugan, a physicist at the University of Chicago who is not affiliated with the recent paper. “The current application for robots shows that the idea survives its first contact with reality. Future work will have to demonstrate whether this principle is a good approximation for other complex systems – from molecules to cells to human crowds to a rock concert (post COVID, of course).
Murugan adds that the principle is not always true, “and only about true when it is true.” But the idea made by the robots shows that, given this driving force, in a low noise state they will dance.
“As soon as you have a bunch of robots that interact with each other and interact with humans … the idea of this paper is that they will be synchronized from time to time. And when it syncs, there will be an emerging behavior, but you don’t necessarily know what that emerging behavior will be, ”said Todd Murphey, a robotist at Northwestern University and co-author of the paper. “If we are not willing to talk about emerging behavior as a fundamental outcome that we should always expect for a sufficiently complex system that is in equilibrium, then we will lose things that can reasonably happen.”
The implications of robotic movements go beyond the refinement of the DDR technique. Although there are only three wonderful devices in rotation, smart phones have displayed a principle that could be applied to cars with automatic control or even to the people inside them.