Note: The writer of this review has followed shooting on a digital screen from home. Before making the decision to see it – or any other film – in a cinema, please consider the health risks involved. There it is an interview with scientific experts.
Liam Neeson, the growled Irish saint of former police officers and his dead father, is not an obvious choice for the role of a conservative farmer in the south-west of the country. However, he is like Jim Hanson in Robert Lorenz shooting, wearing a cowboy hat and carrying a rifle on purpose while transmitting on board the Border Patrol about some “AI” near his property. As we will soon learn, the land that Jim defends will not be his for much longer. Standing in front of the farm at dusk, with an American flag draped bald over his shoulder, he is greeted with a forced execution notice by some weenie from the bank. Coyotes and eagles, both literal and figurative, have appeared. The symbolism of being the lord of economic anxiety is a heavy burden to bear.
A few days later, Jim spies on a woman and her son sneaking through the heavy fence.. The second amendment and the shine of steel come out. Neeson’s interpretation of an American accent rarely sounded less convincing: “We’re sorry, Pancho, these illegals are mine.” The confrontation becomes a shooting, the woman dies and, after a long search, Jim is on the run with the boy, Miguel (Jacob Perez), partly out of guilt for his role in his mother’s death. and partly because a backpack full of money from the stolen cartel is involved. At this point, things started to fall into place. The child, the laughter, the politics, the indifferent rhythm, the indescribable heart, the handles: This is supposed to be the property of Clint Eastwood.
G / O Media may receive a commission
It is possible that. shooting it was designed for the nameless old man. Lorenz, who previously led the year 2012 Curve problems, has been the Eastwood manufacturer ever since mystical evil, was his assistant director before and generally recorded for more than a quarter of a century in the United States in Clint. Perhaps the material was too close to Eastwood’s recent and future travels (mold and currently in the post Macho cries), or maybe he just asked for a younger, taller, rotten, aged star. Obviously, Lorenz is not shy about inevitable comparisons. He even gives Eastwood a cameo of his kind through a clip from Hang them up playing on a motel room TV. (It’s the egg scene.)
This makes a critic’s job a little too easy. If someone were to diagnose a central problem with shooting, is that it is not actually a Clint Eastwood movie; it lacks breathing space, first-rate nonchalance that always makes an attractive opposite to the meaning of the Eastwoodian purpose. Despite concessions to the Neeson screen character (Jim is a widower and a disillusioned regular at the local watering hole), the plot remains uninhabited. Jim tries to deliver Miguel to the Chicago boy’s relatives, while he is pursued by a cartel killer (Juan Pablo Raba) and his own stepdaughter (Katheryn Winnick), who is a border guard. Hearts are softened; man-boy connection; the mile markers of a quasi-redemption arc are traversed by means of a roadmap proper.
The result is somewhere between homage and anonymity, sprinkled with a few rigid, perfunctory fight scenes. Resisting all this, Neeson remains the image of a persevering and visible commitment. Even he seems to know that he is the wrong man for the job, sharing his dusty archetype with the kind of good duty that shooting otherwise fails to express. We can imagine the severity, the self-flagellation, the self-loathing,Taken-The Neeson cycle is waiting for him to break out, so that he can gather his character’s drink, his regrets, the apparent loss of his faith. But instead, he’s behind the wheel of a pickup truck with a dog by his side, muttering about cell phones and government.