Iran nuclear deal: IAEA inspections will continue for the next 3 months

IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi said on Sunday that the two sides had reached a temporary “technical agreement” following his trip to Iran, which recently signaled plans to reduce co-operation with the global nuclear security guard.

Iran announced last week that it would stop implementing the IAEA’s additional protocol, effectively limiting which facilities inspectors could inspect and when they could access them, making it more difficult for experts to determine whether Tehran is trying to develop nuclear weapons.

The interim agreement reached on Sunday would mitigate the impact of Iran’s withdrawal from the additional protocol, Grossi said. “What we have agreed on is something that is viable, it is useful to eliminate this gap that we have now, save the situation now,” he said.

While the same number of international inspectors will remain in Iran, Grossi said, their access to nuclear facilities will be more limited and they will no longer be allowed to conduct last-minute “rapid inspections”.

“This is not a replacement for what we had before. This is a temporary solution that allows us to continue to give the world assurances about what is happening there, in the hope that we can return to a more complete picture,” Grossi said.

IAEA monitors have been granted comprehensive inspection rights as part of the 2015 Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA), an important agreement that was intended to limit Iran’s nuclear program and prevent the country from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for improved sanctions. Iran has long argued that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes, despite skepticism from the international community.

Former US President Donald Trump considered the agreement too generous with Tehran and abandoned it in 2018. In response, Iran has gradually reduced its commitments to the agreement. This included enriching uranium – the fissile material used to make nuclear bombs – to higher levels than agreed.
The administration of US President Joe Biden said last week that Washington is willing to hold talks with Tehran and other signatories to the Iranian nuclear deal, just before either side takes any tangible action to save or return to compliance.

The two sides were at a standstill. Washington and Tehran have previously insisted that the other must be the first to return under the agreement.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said that as the party that chose to leave the agreement, the responsibility remains with the United States.

“The United States needs to establish its good faith to return to the nuclear deal,” Zarif said in an interview with CNN earlier this month. “The United States is not part of the nuclear deal, and the United States is not part of the nuclear deal because of its own withdrawal decision, without taking the routes available to it under the nuclear deal.”

State Department officials were careful to point out that their desire to stay with partners and Iran was not a concession or even the beginning of nuclear negotiations, but instead was simply the first diplomatic step to find out how to start talking. substantive issues.

“Until we sit down and talk, nothing will happen. It does not mean that when we sit down and talk we will succeed, but we know that if we do not take this step, the situation is just going to go from bad to worse,” he said. a senior State Department official.

Jake Sullivan, Biden’s national security adviser, told CNN last week that U.S. officials were particularly concerned about Iran’s decision to refuse to cooperate with the IAEA and that “the first order of business here would be for Iranians to decide to move beyond respect and then I think there is a diplomatic path. ”

“We’re at an early stage here,” Sullivan said. “It will take a job, take a hard-headed, clear-eyed diplomacy, and finally make a decision for Iran that they are ready to take the necessary steps to secure the world and to show the world that their program nuclear) has an exclusively peaceful purpose. ”

.Source