That was the headline of a Minneapolis police press release on May 25, 2020, in the hours after an unnamed man in his 40s died. Absent from the nearly 200-word post is any mention of officers holding him down, a knee in the neck, or any idea of how long this “interaction” lasted.
In light of his belief, that original press release is worth rethinking to understand how police statements can hide the truth with a mix of passive language, blatant omissions, and garbled sense of timing.
The post begins by saying that Minneapolis police officers responded to a report of an “ongoing forgery” noting that the suspect “appeared to be under the influence.”
Two officers arrived and found the suspect, a man who was believed to be in his forties, in his car. He was ordered to get out of his car. After he got out, he physically opposed officers. Handcuffed and noted that he appeared to be suffering in medical emergency Officers called for an ambulance He was transported by ambulance to Hennepin County Medical Center, where he died a short time later.
At no time were weapons of any kind used by anyone involved in this incident. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has been called in to investigate this incident at the request of the Minneapolis Police Department.
“No officers were injured in the incident. Body-worn cameras were on and activated during this incident.”
The mail was sent by John Elder, the director of the Office of Public Information under the Minneapolis Police Department.
How police language covered up the truth
Everything in the police station is technically true.
The officers did notice that he was in a medical emergency, and they called an ambulance. No weapons were ‘used’, at least in the sense that they did not shoot or hit him with a weapon.
But all things considered, the post is deep misleading and tries to cover up the role of the officers in his death.
It reverses the timing of the handcuffs and hides the fact that Floyd was in handcuffs almost from the start of their interaction.
It notes that he was handcuffed in the same sentence and was “in medical emergency,” even though they happened about 20 minutes apart. Most importantly, it ignores what the police did between those two events.
It also does not mention that former officer Thomas Lane aimed his gun at Floyd while in his vehicle, which could be interpreted as ‘using’ a weapon.
The 17-year-old, Darnella Frazier, posted her video to Facebook, which was seen by people around the world, including the Minneapolis police chief. Genevieve Hansen, an off-duty firefighter who was turned down from providing assistance to Floyd, also filmed parts of the scene from a slightly different angle. Another high school student used her friend’s phone to film the incident, she testified.
What the police did after seeing video of bystanders
When he first learned that a man had been hospitalized while in police custody, Minneapolis police chief Medaria Arradondo alerted the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and called the mayor, testifying in Chauvin’s trial. He then watched video of a city camera arrest across the street, but nothing jumped out, he testified.
At around midnight, a communications officer contacted him to show him Frazier’s bystander video, giving the chief a close-up view of the incident, he testified.
On May 26, when Frazier’s video went viral and caused widespread outrage, the Minneapolis Police Department press release was updated with another vague line: part of this investigation. “
On Wednesday, George Floyd’s brother Philonise Floyd said it was the presence of cameras that opened doors to the “historic” verdict in the Chauvin trial.
CNN’s Aditi Sangal contributed to this report.