Fernando Guerrero’s decision to punish America has sparked controversy on social media
In the 40th minute, the referee Fernando Guerrero fled to the VAR to check if a sweep of Roberto Alvarado on Álvaro Fidalgo was criminal. The central defender decided yes, so the Eagles took the lead due to that decision and the controversy immediately started.
Arbitration analyst al ESPN, Felipe Ramos Rizos, considered the decision of Fernando Guerrero correct, because he first marked that it was not his fault and then withdrew due to VAR.
“He will face a criminal sentence in favor of America. If there is a lack “, assured the whistle on his social networks, while Fernando Guerrero analyzed the action from the Azteca stadium.
Once Emanuel Aguilera scored 1-0, due to the penalty, the commentator from ESPN, David Faitelson called the decision a “gift” for the Eagles.
“A gift for America … Let’s hope the game gets better …”, the journalist from ESPN. “A not very memorable game and a penalty full of controversy … Cruz Azul-América, so far, a disappointment …”, he added in another comment.
Along with the publications of David Faitelson and Felipe Ramos Rizo, the word “criminal” has become a trend in social networks, as some fans felt that there was no blame on Álvaro Fidalgo, while others claimed that he shot him in the face. Inside the area.
With that action, Aguilera took the opportunity to score 1-0, the only goal of the game until the break. America is looking to end the 12-game winning streak for Cruz Azul, while Santiago Solari’s side are heading for their eighth straight victory in the Argentine’s first at the helm of Azulcremas.
Cruz Azul added six away games without conceding, a goal that ended against Águilas at the Azteca Stadium, due to a penalty that was scored thanks to VAR.