Last week, 90 years old Aaron Epstein pulled one out quarter page ad in the Wall Street Journal hoping to convince AT&T to improveas-DSL Fiber Internet Molasses Epstein would have cost $ 10,000 to get this out ad, but it seems to have worked. The resident of North Hollywood, California, has ultra-fast speeds today and we like that for him.
Conformable Ars Technica, after Epstein’s story went viral and landed interviews with TV networks and a brief mention on The late show with Stephen Colbert, AT&T showed up at home this week and installed fiber internet for him and his wife, Anne. The couple now has over 300 Mbps speeds instead of 3 Mbps they received before.
It wasn’t a simple undertaking for the technicians, but they connected Epstein and his wife to the internet better in just two days. Epstein’s neighborTwo or three blocks away were the AT&T F.iber, but for some reason Epstein’s house was not connected for this. Epstein told Ars Technica that AT&T said the additional cable installation costs the company “Thousands and thousands of dollars.“According to Ars, there was some confusion as to whether AT&T would completely connect the Epstein neighborhood. AT&T did not mention whether its close neighbors would get fiber internet sometime in the future, now that the lines are installed on their street, which connects to the fiber lines in the same neighborhood just a few blocks away.
Not everyone has $ 10,000 to pay for a newspaper ad, and they shouldn’t force Internet service providers to provide fair internet service. Even Epstein says the media that took over his story prompted AT&T to take action, not necessarily the announcement. But if AT&T can, at the drop of a hat, put fiber someone’s house in two days, although it is supposed to cost them thousands of dollars, then it seems that the ISP should be able to do the same for more neighborhoods – especially areas where the only option for residents is AT&T DSL.
G / O Media may receive a commission
However, Epstein was lucky in this regard. He has a choice – if you can call it that – between AT&T and Spectrum, but he wanted to switch completely to AT&T because his phone service is through them.
Last October, AT&T has announced that it will no longer offer DSL as a new service. Those who already pay for DSL, such as Epstein, may keep their services, but the company would no longer sell DSL plans. This is a major problem, because for many Americans, AT&T DSL is their only internet provider option.
A common report from the American Workers’ Communication (CWA) and the National Alliance for Digital Inclusion (NDLA) reviewitfound that AT&T connected newer, richer neighborhoods to fiber and laid only fiber foundation in some underserved areas and poorly served areas. Epstein’s case seems to be a textbook example of this.
An AT&T spokessaid the person before burnt that “its investment decisions are based on the capacity needs of [its] network and application for [its] Services. “But you shouldn’t have to place an ad in one of the largest newspapers in the country for your requirements. a better service to be heard.