More importantly, it also measures methane, which is 80 times more powerful than carbon dioxide over the next 20 years. You know it better as natural gas. Heating and cooking aren’t the only culprits of methane. Two thirds of emissions come from farm cows, factory farms and rotting landfills. But as any Texan will tell you, it’s much easier to control gas coming out of the ground than gas coming out of cows.
“We found that the Permian Basin radiates more than double that of any other oil and gas region in the United States,” said Robinson.
Ban all prohibitions
Then the Republican governor signed his own executive order, ordering any government agency to give him every reason to sue the Biden government and stop the clean energy efforts. By calling on cities like San Francisco, where a movement is growing to ban natural gas stoves and appliances from new construction, Abbott vowed to ban all bans.
“In Texas, we won’t let cities use political correctness to dictate which energy source you use,” he said. “So I support legislation that prohibits cities and counties from banning natural gas appliances.”
But as a sign of the changing times, Abbott’s fierce opposition to the Paris Agreement puts him at odds with the statements and sound bites of Big Oil’s biggest lobbyist.
“We think the threat of climate change is very real,” Mike Sommers, CEO of the American Petroleum Institute (API), told CNN. “We support both industry and federal government actions in the United States and around the world to address this very important issue that we know is existential in nature.”
A call for more pipelines
As for Biden to be an existential threat to oil and gas, Sommers seems less concerned, arguing there is no need to switch them to geothermal, solar or wind, as the world will demand fuels that will burn and leak for generations .
“This industry currently provides about 60% of the world’s energy,” he said. “And the trend that there will be a transition in energy. But I am also confident that this industry will be around for a long time to come.”
To solve the methane problem, he argues that if America only had more pipelines, the industry wouldn’t need to burn so much natural gas unnecessarily.
“I think the biggest challenge we have from an emissions perspective is frankly getting our infrastructure right,” said Sommers. “We need to make sure we have pipelines to get these products to market as quickly as possible. And that means we need a regulatory structure that allows these pipelines to be built.”
Kelsey Robinson of the EDF has a simpler idea. “Cutting methane emissions actually creates a job in and of itself because we need people to investigate these sites and then take steps to fix those leaks.”
“There’s no point in burning it,” said Texas state geologist Scott Tinker as we stroll outside his office on the extensive Texas rock garden map. “They don’t have the collection systems to catch it. So instead of leaking the methane, they burn it and they leak CO2. CO2 as a product is better than methane if you are going to put something into the atmosphere. But it is” it would be much better to collect it. “
After the 2008 recession, Tinker says the fracking boom took West Texas by surprise. Years of oil field decline saw a renaissance as the new method of injecting water into shale doubled oil production and created invisible streams of methane that it could not capture.
“The conversation is shifting,” said Tinker, after pressure from the public and shareholders. “It is happening, but it is slow, it costs a lot of money, requires approval for the pipelines. It takes an industry and a regulatory system that made this happen.”
“It brings together producers, big and small, to share technology and best practices to reduce methane emissions,” he said. “And it works.”
Check-in from space
But far beyond the methane problem, the only way to save life on Earth as well as the fossil fuel industry is to rapidly develop technology to capture and store carbon on an astonishing scale. This would require sophisticated, expensive methane traps to be built around the chimneys of every petrochemical, power and steel mill in the world.
Hopes for such a panacea were hit hard this week when Petra Nova’s factory outside Houston was closed indefinitely. Backed by a $ 190 million grant from the Department of Energy, the four-year plant aimed to capture 90% of the carbon dioxide flowing from a 240-megawatt coal-fired power plant. It was the only major carbon capture project in the US after a $ 7.5 billion project in Mississippi shut down before ever going online.
Exxon Mobil says they are working on 20 new carbon capture projects around the world, including one in Texas, as part of a new $ 3 billion investment in a company they call ExxonMobil Low Carbon Solutions.
But Robinson and her flying methane fighters have heard promises before. With no enforceable regulation for producers large and small, she says profit-making almost always wins.
“ExxonMobil and some of the other major manufacturers have set pretty high goals for how they want to maintain their emissions,” said Robinson. “But we found that here in the Permian basin, the methane leak rate is more than 10 times higher than what many companies plan to do.”
In the meantime, she says she will let her small team fly, snort, and measure methane, while the plane will soon have a high-altitude backup. Following a $ 100 million grant from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ Earth Fund, the EDF will soon launch their own methane-hunting satellite.