He was responding to a question on Labor MP Wayne David, who later posted on Twitter that Cleverly’s comment was a “slap” to Johnson.
In answer to my question, #FCDO Minister James Cleverly refused to support the prime minister’s “interference” in his work #International Criminal Court. Clearly, the government has supported the “independence” of the ICC. A slap in the face for Boris Johnson! pic.twitter.com/N2T6ZEuFKS– Wayne David (@WayneDavid_MP) April 20, 2021
The Palestinian Authority’s envoy to Britain, Husam Zomlot, interpreted Cleverly’s statement as a rejection of Johnson’s opposition to a possible investigation into war crimes against Israel at the ICC.
“We appreciate the British government’s support for the ICC, without exception. We also appreciate the role of the (Labor) opposition in clarifying the issues. War crimes must be punished no matter who commits them, “Zomlot wrote on Twitter.
cnxps.cmd.push (function () {cnxps ({playerId: ’36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b’}). render (‘4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6’);});
if (window.location.pathname.indexOf (“656089”)! = -1) {console.log (“hedva connatix”); function.getElementsByClassName (“divConnatix”)[0].style.display = “none”;}
We appreciate the British government’s support for the ICC, without exception. We also appreciate the role of the opposition in clarifying the issues. War crimes must be punished no matter who committed them.@IntlCrimCourt https://t.co/ItfM9skq9M– Husam Zomlot (@hzomlot) April 20, 2021
The British Ambassador to Israel, Neil Wigan, spoke about the issue in an interview with Jerusalem Post editor-in-chief Yaakov Katz and contributing editor-in-chief Lahav Kharkov, which will be published on the weekly’s weekly podcast later this week.
Wigan said his country was a strong supporter of the ICC, adding that he respected the court and wanted it to succeed. “But as Prime Minister Johnson put it, we have had real concerns about how he is addressing the situation in Palestine, both from a judicial point of view and our support for Israel.
“I have made this position public. The court must have its own independence to decide how it wants to approach this. But we thought it was important to get this public position. It’s very unusual, it’s very rare for us to publicly comment on an ICC issue, so that’s an important statement for us, “Wigan said.
Johnson addressed the issue in response to a question from the Conservatives Friends of Israel. In it, he asserted his support for the independence of the ICC.
Johnson wrote: “As a founding member of the ICC, I have been one of its strongest supporters and we continue to respect the independence of the institution.
However, he added: “We oppose the ICC’s investigation into Palestinian war crimes. We do not accept that the ICC has jurisdiction in this case, given that Israel is not a party to the Rome Statute and Palestine is not a sovereign state. This investigation gives the impression that it is a partial and prejudicial attack on a friend and ally of Great Britain. ”