A battle for control of WallStreetBets could break out

The CEO of Reddit says that WallStreetBets is

Photographer: Tiffany Hagler-Geard / Bloomberg

Looks like he’s fighting on the RedSit WallStreetBets forum and it’s not over what stock is next GameStop Corp.

Just a few weeks after the site was used to galvanize an epic short gathers actions of the video game retailer, forcing the real Wall Street to consider the strength of a united front of traders, signs of dissent appear around the stock message board of 8.5 million members.

To say the least, it is an unconventional battlefield, one in which online abstractions represent man, identity is blurred, and confirmation is often impossible. At the same time, the drama has become hard to ignore on Wall Street. The maneuver in the forum, carried out by people whose only real-world manifestation is an internet screen name, was able to move stocks of tens of billions of dollars.

While online battles are obviously not unusual, any cohesion of signs decomposes between the free cohort of coordinating presence of WallStreetBets could predict a weakening of its market power. And as the last few weeks have shown, this would be news for day traders and investors.

Read more: SEC Hunts for Fraud in Social-Media Posts Hyping GameStop

First, some definitions. WallStreetBets is a quasi-independent messaging forum hosted by Reddit, GameStop’s short-squeeze site that ran this week. While anyone who registers can apparently post there, some members are more equal than others: the users known as moderators are the volunteer army of site porters. Monitors and sometimes deletes messages – for example, if the post is spam or violates the rules against harassment or stockpile promotion.

For the past 24 hours, active moderators, who applied the rules as the GameStop craze has swept the site, say their privileges have been revoked.

Who is someone on the WSB – that is, what living person is behind a post – is often unknown, which means that descriptions of what is happening there are largely just chronicles of the interaction of screen names on a website. While many moderators have been active long enough to establish a kind of personality through their messages, it is never completely clear who is who. The risk of distortion and hacking is always present.

.Source